Has anyone tried changing the minimum and maximum number of satellites in UBX-CFG-GNSS? Is there a plus for accuracy in this?
2 Answers
I don’t know there is a definitive answer for this. Generally they want you to use the Series 9 Configuration methods. Increasing the mask angle might have the most direct impact on accuracy. In post processing you’d need contemporaneous data from two sources, and you can usually either pick a mask angle for exclusion there, or they can be rejected as outliers if the data is unhelpful.
Interactions and personal observation is that there is a 32 satellite ceiling on those actually used in a navigation solution. This might be to stop legacy stuff breaking, or just keep the processing bandwidth, and matrices, in check.
https://portal.u-blox.com/s/question/0D52p0000A8lz6oCQA/is-there-a-way-of-knowing-which-satellites-an-f9p-module-is-using-in-an-rtk-solution
https://portal.u-blox.com/s/question/0D52p00009Tesk6CAB/neom9n-pubx03-number-of-gnss-satellites-tracked-32-42-92
Interactions and personal observation is that there is a 32 satellite ceiling on those actually used in a navigation solution. This might be to stop legacy stuff breaking, or just keep the processing bandwidth, and matrices, in check.
https://portal.u-blox.com/s/question/0D52p0000A8lz6oCQA/is-there-a-way-of-knowing-which-satellites-an-f9p-module-is-using-in-an-rtk-solution
https://portal.u-blox.com/s/question/0D52p00009Tesk6CAB/neom9n-pubx03-number-of-gnss-satellites-tracked-32-42-92
Clive1, thank you for answer! Also in U-blox F9P specisication write: 184–channel u–blox F9 engine. But in U-center write max 60 channels. Is it hardware limit on Ardusimple board?
The ZED has two ICs each with 92 channels, the acquisition/tracking split isn’t specified, one IC does the low L band the other the higher L band. So for any given satellite two channels will be used.
Clive1, it is interesting. On the other hand, 60 channels are enough for my tasks
Please login or Register to submit your answer